Reasons You Should Care a Lot About the 2. The Bachelor Party Full Movie Online Free. Census. Do you care about the 2. You should. We all probably should care more about the 2. John Thompson, the director of the Census Bureau and the man in charge of running the 2.

References to the coming robot revolution, killer droids, malicious AIs and human extermination abounded, some more or less serious than others. The more data, the better, right? When it comes to genetics, it turns out that might not be the case.

It’s hard to overstate what huge news this is, and yet the story isn’t getting a ton of attention—possibly because there’s a lot of other huge news too, and, well, the human brain can handle only so much. Doing your best to stay up with current events can often feel like drowning in a torrent of never…Read more Read. Losing the director of the Census Bureau at this stage of the game is a big deal, because a leaderless Census Bureau means a possibly not- especially- accurate census in 2.

American life. Thompson’s stepping- down might not be such a big deal if we had an administration that was prioritizing a fair and accurate census—but it looks like the White House has its hands full with other stuff, to put it mildly. To get an idea of what Thompson’s departure means, I spoke to Kenneth Prewitt, former director of the Census Bureau and the current Carnegie Professor of Public Affairs and the Vice- President for Global Centers at Columbia University, about why we should care. And more important, why everyone should care, because it would be too easy to let this story disappear in the maelstrom of the current news cycle. Literally every American social program uses census numbers to allocate resources.

Get the latest science news and technology news, read tech reviews and more at ABC News. E! Online - Your source for entertainment news, celebrities, celeb news, and celebrity gossip. Check out the hottest fashion, photos, movies and TV shows!

Your fire department, your schools—the data gathered in the decadal census, determines, for example, whether new schools are opened or current schools are shut down. Transportation grants and education grants, among others, are distributed proportionally. If the Veteran’s Administration wants to place a hospital for elderly veterans, they obviously want to select a location heavily populated by elderly veterans. If the numbers are off, the hospital gets mis- sited—and the vets don’t get health care. If you have phone phobia, you’re not alone. I’m a recovering member of the club myself.) If the…Read more Read.

Prewitt continues, “Or take emergency relief. After every census, [fire departments] recalibrate [their] entire system of emergency relief: where have people moved, what’s the age structure, do they have telephones, are they elderly, do they live alone? All of that is stuff that gets absorbed by fire departments, so when they get an emergency—there’s a flood, there’s a tornado—they know where the people are who have to be rescued. If they’re wrong, they don’t find people.” If you want your community to have the services it needs, your neighbors need to be counted. If you’re trying to govern a society and respond to citizen needs, you’ve got to know who they are, what their conditions are, and where they are,” says Prewitt. Running an accurate census takes money.

Thompson stepped down amidst budget disputes. Prewitt tells me, “Right now they are underfunded. The other thing that is seriously underfunded right now is the [census’] advertising campaign,” which was handled by professionals for the first time in 2. It’s very sophisticated stuff..

To ensure an accurate census, you need to open field offices, run outreach efforts, and hire a huge temporary workforce. Not enough money means not enough workers to conduct the census, and that means people will be undercounted. People who are undercounted are invisible.”3. Fair representation hinges on a fair census.

The census determines how the 4. House are allocated among the states. Every decade the population goes up in some states and down in others, and reps are redistributed accordingly. As Prewitt notes in this recent interview in the Washington Post, “Repeated reallocation is fundamental to the fairness of our representative democracy.”4.

You need a director who knows what they’re doing. If a new, qualified director isn’t ready to step in on July 1, even on an acting basis, other staffers will start to leave for other jobs. There will be a morale problem, and there will be people who will have job opportunities who will go someplace else. Especially the high- powered math statisticians.

Do you care about the 2020 census? You should. We all probably should care more about the 2020 census, because John Thompson, the director of the Census Bureau and.

They love the census because it is a big deal,” says Prewitt. A skeleton crew is not going to get a good count. Everyone wants a good census. This is a bipartisan issue. Everyone wants their neighborhood and state counted and wants accurate numbers; fire departments and schools want adequate counts; retailers want accurate estimates of residents before investing in a given community. Prewitt notes: “The business community wants good numbers.

They don’t want to mis- locate a Wal- Mart because they misunderstood the population base. In some respects the commercial sector is one of the best defenders of a quality census.”Of every 1. Americans, 4. 51 of us will get cancer in a given year. But that varies depending on …Read more Read. But one could put one’s finger on the scale, either deliberately or through underfunding. Black Americans have historically been undercounted in the census; Prewitt also identifies “hard- to- count” communities: the poor, the non- English- speaking, immigrants, people who are suspicious of the government.

It takes a big effort to find and count those people, and that effort takes money and an organized staff. In fairly quiet ways, small ways, you can selectively undercount. You do it by where you spend your advertising dollar. You do it by where you put your best staff. You do it by where you open up offices.” Prewitt stresses that he’s not implying that anyone in the current administration is angling for selectively undercounting, but that even ordinary bureaucratic problems, like lack of funding or disorganization, can really foul things up.

Vigilance is important. The time to take action is now. Planning, testing, and advertising efforts need to get underway now.

Prewitt tells me that “these two or three years leading to the census are every bit as important as the census itself.” You can’t postpone the census—it’s constitutionally mandated to occur every ten years whether we’re ready or not. And you can’t re- do a botched census. Community groups may scream, mayors may say, “hey, we have a lot more people than that here,” but what’s done is done. Which means we need to talk to our reps (and our other community leaders) now. I don’t know how you get the average citizen to pay attention to it until it’s too late. That’s the really scary thing,” warns Prewitt.

So do something. Start by talking to your mayor’s office, the chamber of commerce, churches and community groups, and veterans’ groups in your area. If it seems like no one’s doing anything, or they say “the census is three years from now, who cares?”, start a movement yourself in your community. Pressure your reps to care. Prewitt says if he were trying to mobilize people, he would frame it this way: “I would say that President Trump can have a huge census. He can have a bigger census than Obama’s census in 2. Clinton’s census in 2. Indeed a bigger census than George Washington’s in 1.

The president of the United States can have the biggest and best census ever conducted..[Trump] likes big numbers, and he likes big numbers he believes he’s responsible for. He can actually be responsible for the biggest and best census ever done.”Got it? Somebody start a hashtag. You don’t need to wait four years before you get your next say in how the government is run.…Read more Read.

This Study is Forcing Scientists to Rethink the Human Genome. The more data, the better, right?

When it comes to genetics, it turns out that might not be the case. As both genetic sequencing has gotten cheaper and computerized data analysis has gotten better, more and more researchers have turned to what are known as genome- wide association studies in hopes of sussing out which individual genes are associated with particular disorders. The logic here is simple: If you have a whole lot of people with a disease, you should be able to tell what genetic traits those people have in common that might be responsible. This thinking has resulted in an entire catalogue of hundreds of research studies that has shed light on the genetic origins of diseases such as type 2 diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, Crohn’s disease, and prostate cancer, while helping fuel the rise of personalized medicine.

Now, though, a new analysis calls the entire approach into question. Writing in the journal Cell, a group of Stanford University geneticists write that such large studies are likely to produce genetic variants with little bearing on the disease in question—essentially false positives that confuse the results. Intuitively, one might expect disease- causing variants to cluster into key pathways that drive disease etiology [the causes of disease],” they write. But for complex traits, association signals tend to be spread across most of the genome—including near many genes without an obvious connection to disease.”Their analysis suggests an intriguing new way of viewing the genome in which nearly every gene impacts every other gene. Instead of a system in which you can plug and play different variables to affect different results, it’s a complex, inter- related network. They call this the “omnigenic model.”Their work has broad, sweeping implications for the entire field of genetics.

First off, that all those big, expensive genome- wide association studies may wind up being little more than a waste of time because they turn up genetic variants that, while perhaps interconnected to the disease, may not actually point to a viable target for things like drug therapy. Watch In My Father`S Garden Online Facebook. Indeed, genes that often seem related to diseases have stumped researchers in terms of the role they actually play in the condition.

In the paper, for example, the Stanford researchers re- analysed a 2. DNA variants linked to height—but only 1.

In the paper, the Stanford researchers suggest that the impact of each variant has a teeny impact on height. Far from solving a problem though, this new research merely opens up an entirely new line of questioning—and shows us once again, that we may not know nearly as much as we thought we did.